HickeyHoltzman357

Large Technology and Human Growth

Some basic premises - often fashioned by leaders and supported with the led - exercise the collective conscience from the led in as much as they stimulate a willed development. The development is usually superior and not necessarily civilized. The premises in question are on this form: "Our level of technological advancement is first rate. Upon reaching this degree, we also have to organize our society for tranquility, and to guarantee the peace, technology must be modified to foster the insurance plan of war. " Technological advancement that's pushed in this direction sets a dangerous precedent with regard to other societies that fear a threat for their respective sovereignties. They are pushed for you to also foster a conflict technology.

In the domain involving civilization, this mode of development is just not praiseworthy, nor is it morally justifiable. Since it is certainly not morally justifiable, it is socially irresponsible. An inspection of the particular premises will reveal that it's the last one that poses a challenge. The last premise could be the conclusion of two previous premises but is not the slightest bit logically deduced. What it shows is a passionately deduced conclusion, and being so, it fails to be reckoned being a conclusion from a rationally prepared mind, at least at time at which it had been deduced.

A society that advances good above presuppositions - and especially according to the illogical conclusion - has transmitted the psyche of non-negotiable superiority to the people. All along, the power of passion dictates the pace associated with human conduct. Whether in constructive sites to be or willed partnerships, the principle of equality fails to work precisely because of the superiority syndrome that grips the first choice and the led. And a different society that will not share in the collective sensibilities or passion regarding such society has, by the expected common sense, become a potential or perhaps actual enemy and confronts confrontation on all achievable fronts.

Most of what we learn about the present world, of course, via the media, is dominated by state-of-the-art technology. Societies that have the most of such technology will also be, time and again, claimed to be probably the most advanced. It is not just their advancement that lifts these to the pinnacle of power, superiority, and fame. They can also make use of technology to simplify and advance an understanding of life and nature in the different direction, a direction that has a tendency to eliminate, as much as possible, a prior connection involving life and nature that's, in many respects, mystical and unsafe. This last point will not necessarily mean that technological advancement can be a mark of a superior civilization.

Please click the link for more information about tech blog and technology blog.