LentHardee179

Higher Technology and Human Advancement

Some basic premises - often fashioned by leaders and supported by the led - exercise the collective conscience in the led in as much as they stimulate a willed improvement. The development is usually superior and not necessarily civilized. The premises in question are of the form: "Our level of technological advancement is the best. Upon reaching this amount, we also have to prepare our society for peacefulness, and to guarantee the particular peace, technology must be adjusted to foster the insurance plan of war. " Technological advancement that may be pushed in this direction sets a dangerous precedent with regard to other societies that fear a threat thus to their respective sovereignties. They are pushed for you to also foster a warfare technology.

In the domain associated with civilization, this mode of development is just not praiseworthy, nor is it morally justifiable. Since it is not morally justifiable, it is socially irresponsible. An inspection of the particular premises will reveal it is the last one that poses a difficulty. The last premise may be the conclusion of two earlier premises but is not the slightest bit logically deduced. What it shows is often a passionately deduced conclusion, and being so, it fails to be reckoned like a conclusion from a rationally ready mind, at least at some time at which it had been deduced.

A society that advances based on the above presuppositions - and especially in line with the illogical conclusion - features transmitted the psyche associated with non-negotiable superiority to their people. All along, the power of interest dictates the pace involving human conduct. Whether in constructive events or willed partnerships, the principle of equality doesn't work precisely due to the superiority syndrome that grips the best and the led. And a different society that will not share in the collective sensibilities or passion involving such society has, by the expected logic, become a potential as well as actual enemy and encounters confrontation on all feasible fronts.

Most of what we understand the present world, of course, via the media, is dominated by state-of-the-art technology. Societies that have probably the most of such technology are, time and again, claimed to be essentially the most advanced. It is not only their advancement that lifts the crooks to the pinnacle of electrical power, superiority, and fame. They can also use technology to simplify and move forward an understanding of life and nature in a different direction, a direction that tends to eliminate, as much as possible, a prior connection between life and nature that's, in many respects, mystical and unsafe. This last point doesn't necessarily mean that technological advancement is really a mark of a excellent civilization.

Please click the link to learn more about tech blog and technology news.