User:PhillyDonley202

Substantial Technology and Human Development

Some basic premises -- often fashioned by leaders and supported by the led - exercise the collective conscience from the led in as far as they stimulate a willed improvement. The development is usually superior and not necessarily civilized. The premises in question are of the form: "Our level of technological advancement is an awesome experience. Upon reaching this level, we also have to organize our society for peace, and to guarantee the particular peace, technology must be changed to foster the insurance plan of war. " Technological advancement which is pushed in this direction sets a dangerous precedent pertaining to other societies that fear a threat to their respective sovereignties. They are pushed to be able to also foster a war technology.

In the domain associated with civilization, this mode of development is not praiseworthy, nor is it morally justifiable. Since it is certainly not morally justifiable, it is socially irresponsible. An inspection of your premises will reveal that it's the last one that poses a difficulty. The last premise is the conclusion of two preceding premises but is not in any way logically deduced. What it shows is really a passionately deduced conclusion, and being so, it fails to be reckoned being a conclusion from a rationally geared up mind, at least at the time at which it has been deduced.

A society that advances based on the above presuppositions - and especially according to the illogical conclusion - provides transmitted the psyche regarding non-negotiable superiority to its people. All along, the power of interest dictates the pace involving human conduct. Whether in constructive engagements or willed partnerships, the principle of equality fails to work precisely as a result of superiority syndrome that grips the best choice and the led. And a different society that won't share in the group sensibilities or passion associated with such society has, by the expected judgement, become a potential or perhaps actual enemy and people confrontation on all probable fronts.

Most of what we discover the present world, of course, via the media, is dominated by state-of-the-art technological innovation. Societies that have probably the most of such technology are also, time and again, claimed to be one of the most advanced. It is not simply their advancement that lifts them to the pinnacle of power, superiority, and fame. They can also make use of technology to simplify and advance an understanding of life and nature in a different direction, a direction that tends to eliminate, as much as feasible, a prior connection among life and nature that's, in many respects, mystical and unsafe. This last point doesn't necessarily mean that technological advancement is a mark of a superior civilization.

Please click the link to learn more about tech news and technology site.